The Third Face of the Coin: Why Smart Leaders Don't Just Choose A or B

In school, you learned probability is 50/50. Heads or tails. Win or lose. Binary outcomes for a binary world.

But what if I told you there's a third option you've been trained to ignore?

A nickel balanced on its edge has a 1-in-6,000 chance of staying there. It's not heads. It's not tails. It's the outcome nobody plans for—the one that breaks the model.

And in real life, the "standing coin" scenarios are the ones that change everything.

The Binary Trap

We love binary thinking. It's clean. It's decisive. It fits on a spreadsheet.

Should you take the job or stay? Marry them or break up? Launch the product or wait?

Every major decision gets squeezed into this cognitive straitjacket: Option A versus Option B. Choose one. Move forward. Don't overthink it.

But here's what nobody tells you: most of the time, the real answer is neither A nor B.

It's C—the option you haven't considered because you've been so focused on the coin flip that you forgot to look at the edge.

The Nassim Taleb Paradox

Nassim Taleb made his fortune betting on what he calls "Black Swan" events—outcomes that are rare, unpredictable, and massively impactful. The things that shouldn't happen according to the model but change entire systems when they do.

His insight wasn't just about identifying rare events. It was about recognizing that our brains systematically ignore the edges of probability distributions.

We plan for heads. We plan for tails. We build entire risk models around the 50/50 split.

And then the coin stands.

The 2008 financial crisis? A standing coin. Models said mortgage-backed securities were safe. Every major institution bet on heads or tails. Nobody planned for the edge case where the entire housing market collapsed simultaneously.

COVID-19? Another standing coin. Pandemic preparedness plans existed, but they assumed gradual spread, not global lockdown. The edge case broke every model.

The existence of the internet itself? A standing coin. In the 1980s, the debate wasn't "internet or no internet"—nobody was even asking that question. It was an edge case that fundamentally restructured human civilization.

Why Smart People Miss the Edge

There's a psychological reason we ignore standing-coin scenarios: they're cognitively expensive.

Binary thinking is cheap. Your brain evolved to make fast A or B decisions: Fight or flight. Safe or dangerous. Friend or foe.

Considering a third option—especially one that doesn't fit existing categories—requires what psychologists call "cognitive flexibility." You have to hold multiple frameworks simultaneously, question your assumptions, and tolerate ambiguity.

Most people's brains rebel against this. It feels like overthinking. Like being indecisive. Like analysis paralysis.

But as entrepreneur Peter Thiel points out: "The most contrarian thing of all is not to oppose the crowd but to think for yourself."

Translation: The edge isn't visible from inside the binary.

The Standing Coin in Business

In 2007, Netflix had a clean binary choice:

Option A: Keep growing the DVD rental business. It's working. Milk it.
Option B: Invest heavily in this untested "streaming" thing that might cannibalize the profitable DVD business.

Reed Hastings chose neither.

He chose the edge: Do both simultaneously. Keep DVDs profitable while betting the company's future on streaming. Maintain the old model while building the new one, even though they competed with each other.

Every analyst said this was insane. You can't serve two masters. Pick a lane. Commit.

The coin stood anyway.

Netflix didn't transition from DVDs to streaming—they existed in both states simultaneously until streaming became viable. The edge case became the entire business.

Compare this to Blockbuster, who saw the same binary: physical rentals or digital. They chose physical. They lost everything. They never considered that the right answer might be "uncomfortably hold both contradictions until one becomes clear."

False Dilemmas Are Everywhere

Once you see it, you can't unsee it: most major decisions are presented as binaries when they're actually false dilemmas.

Career:

• Binary: "Should I stay in my stable job or take the risky startup offer?"
• Edge: Negotiate part-time consulting while testing the startup. Create a hybrid.

Relationships:

• Binary: "Should I commit fully or break up?"
• Edge: "What if we're asking the wrong question? What if the issue isn't commitment—it's how we're defining the relationship?"

Product Development:

• Binary: "Should we prioritize features or stability?"
• Edge: "What if stability is a feature? What if we're solving the wrong problem?"

The edge isn't a compromise between A and B. It's a reframe that makes the binary irrelevant.

Related Thinking: If you often find yourself stuck between two options, you might be interested in how a simple coin flip can reveal what you subconsciously already know.

How to Find the Edge

1. Question the Frame, Not Just the Options

Don't ask "Which option is better?" Ask "Who decided these are the only two options?"

When someone presents you with A or B, your first question should be: "Is this actually a binary choice, or am I being forced into a false dilemma?"

Often, the person presenting the choice (including yourself) has unconsciously eliminated other possibilities because they don't fit existing mental models.

2. Look for What Both Options Assume

If both Option A and Option B assume the same underlying premise, that premise is probably wrong.

Example:
Binary: "Should we expand to new markets or optimize existing ones?"
Hidden assumption: Growth requires geographic expansion.
Edge question: "What if we grow by going deeper in existing markets instead of wider?"

Both options assume expansion = new markets. The edge challenges that assumption entirely.

3. Ask "What Would Make Both Options Irrelevant?"

This is the nuclear option for binary thinking.

If you're debating A vs. B, ask: "What change in circumstances would make this entire debate pointless?"

Netflix in 2007: The debate was DVDs vs. streaming. The edge question was: "What if the real question is how we deliver entertainment, not what format we use?" That reframe made the binary irrelevant.

4. Deliberately Seek Category Errors

Most breakthrough innovations started as category errors—things that didn't fit existing classifications.

Airbnb isn't a hotel or a rental company. It's the edge.
Uber isn't a taxi or a tech company. It's the edge.
Tesla isn't a car company or an energy company. It's the edge.

When you hear "But that's not how we categorize things," you've probably found something interesting.

The Danger of the Edge

Here's the uncomfortable part: not every standing coin is worth betting on.

Some edge cases are just noise. Some are distractions. Some are genuinely bad ideas disguised as innovative thinking.

The 2000s saw plenty of companies that tried to be "the edge" and failed spectacularly. Pets.com tried to stand between e-commerce and pet supplies. Webvan tried to stand between grocery stores and delivery services. They didn't succeed just because they claimed the edge.

So how do you distinguish productive edge-thinking from delusional contrarianism?

The Edge vs. Contrarianism Test

Good edge thinking:

• Challenges a specific assumption with clear reasoning
• Identifies a real need both options miss
• Can articulate why the binary is false, not just that it is
• Willing to be wrong and update

Contrarian noise:

• Opposes popular opinion for the sake of being different
• Doesn't offer a coherent alternative
• Dismisses the binary without understanding why it exists
• Attached to being "right" about being different

The edge isn't about being different. It's about being accurate in a way that binary thinking can't achieve.

The Standing Coin in Your Life

Right now, you probably have a decision you've framed as binary.

Stay or go. Yes or no. This or that.

What if the coin could stand?

What if the real answer isn't choosing between your current options—but questioning why you think those are the only options?

Maybe the job dilemma isn't "stay or leave." Maybe it's "Why do I think fulfillment has to come from my job title instead of how I spend my time?"

Maybe the relationship question isn't "commit or break up." Maybe it's "What kind of commitment are we actually talking about, and who decided those were the rules?"

Maybe the product decision isn't "feature X or feature Y." Maybe it's "Why are we building features when our users need better onboarding?"

The edge isn't always visible. Sometimes you have to stop flipping the coin and just… look at it differently.

What This Means Monday Morning

Next time someone presents you with a binary decision, pause.

Ask yourself:

1. What assumption do both options share?
2. What would make this entire debate irrelevant?
3. Is there a third option I'm ignoring because it doesn't fit the existing categories?

You don't have to find the edge every time. But you should at least look for it.

Because the times you find it—the times the coin actually stands—those are the moments that change everything.

Ready to Question Your Assumptions?

We're building the Binary Breaker tool—designed to help you identify false dilemmas and find the standing-coin solutions hiding in your toughest decisions.

Join the Waitlist →

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Is "finding the edge" just another way of saying "think outside the box"?

Not quite. "Think outside the box" is usually vague advice without a method. Finding the edge is specific: identify the shared assumption in both binary options, then question whether that assumption is actually valid. It's structured contrarianism.

How do I know if I'm finding a genuine edge case or just overthinking?

Set a time limit. Spend 15 minutes actively looking for the edge. If you can't articulate a clear third option that challenges a specific assumption, you're probably overthinking. The edge should feel like "Oh, we've been asking the wrong question" not "Maybe there's a 47th option we haven't considered."

Doesn't considering every edge case lead to decision paralysis?

Only if you treat every edge case as equally likely. The point isn't to plan for every 1-in-6,000 event—it's to recognize when your "binary" decision is actually masking a false dilemma. Ask the edge question once, then move forward.

What's the difference between finding the edge and being indecisive?

Indecisive people can't choose between A and B. Edge-thinkers reject the premise that A and B are the only options. One is paralysis; the other is reframing. If you're stuck, you're indecisive. If you've identified a specific assumption both options share and you're challenging it, you're edge-thinking.

---

Want more on challenging conventional decision-making? Read about how being wrong actually makes you smarter than always seeking the "right" answer.